Recent content by HooThaFuck

No shit, this is SNIPER zoom...  :yuno:

If they are using Whitetigers anticheat, you are fucked anyways. ASI's will not work with it. If they even dare ask to view your PC over teamviewer I would tell 'em to fuck off. Plus, if they were going to view your computer over teamviewer how would you expect an asi to get the job done?

You mother fucks already begging for a 0.3.7 version, WAIT A BIT! IT WAS ONLY RELEASED TODAY, PERIOD.

Explain how you know the cleo is blocked. Are they using the client sided anti-cheat by whitetiger? Are they using any other client sided anti-cheat? If so, an ASI will not do you one better. If not, a server can NOT detect files in their clients system, they do NOT have the ability to detect...

You are the only one that doesn't think this is useless. It really is a useless idea. If you choose to disagree maybe you should explain WHY you need an asi script that could very simply be a cleo mod.

Obviously, doesn't mean he won't give the code up when he visits :P

xyztro: source plz? FYP's is buggy for me and I'm not good with memory addresses.

I tried my self of course, my code is below. What I tried to do was enable custom speeds. What really happens is I drive backwards constantly and I can't change the speed limit. Key 73 is 'i', so I expected i+0 to turn off the system, i+# to set a new speed. It seems like none of the keys...

Why would you want this to be ASI?

I have this code that crashes when I type /that. {$CLEO .cs} 0000: NOP REPEAT     WAIT 500 UNTIL SAMP.Available()                                             0B34: samp register_client_command "that" to_label @CMD_THAT       :loop     WAIT 0     GOTO @loop       :CMD_THAT     WAIT 0    ...

This and the fact that his code is literally the same as the cleo code but converted. XD

That's not the point, the snippet contained the addresses he needed.

This is what Opcode gave me to memory hack it. :getChatEntryText 0AF7: samp 1@ = get_base 1@ += 0x212A6C 0A8D: 1@ = read_memory 1@ size 4 virtual_protect 0 1@ += 0x136 0@ *= 252 // size of stChatEntry 005A: 1@ += 0@ // (int) 1@ += 28 0AB2: ret 1 1@ So the offset is 0x212A6C right?

Why did you bump? The question was answered.

You can delay packets, but not with cleo afaik. http://ugbase.eu/releases-26/(open-source)packet-transmission-delayer-(*-aka-lag-mode-*)/